Musings and frustrations

April 20, 2008

Lovin’ WPF

Filed under: WPF — Tags: , , — peteohanlon @ 8:49 pm

Recently we’ve been moving more and more towards using WPF to deliver LOB applications (Line Of Business). It took me a while to persuade the team that WPF was something worth investing time and effort in, which is funny really because they normally jump at the chance to play with new technologies. So, how did I do it? Ironically - it was with a hugely trivial example; a status bar. Basically I showed them how the same code could be written in markup in two ways. The first one was:

<Window x:Class="WorkforcePF.Window1"
  xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
  xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
  Title="Window1" Height="300" Width="300">
  <DockPanel>
    <StatusBar Name="statusBar1" Height="20" VerticalAlignment="Bottom"
      DockPanel.Dock="Bottom">
      <StatusBar.ItemsPanel>
        <ItemsPanelTemplate>
          <Grid>
            <Grid.RowDefinitions>
              <RowDefinition Height="*"/>
            </Grid.RowDefinitions>
            <Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
              <ColumnDefinition Width="4*" />
              <ColumnDefinition Width="Auto" />
              <ColumnDefinition/>
            </Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
          </Grid>
        </ItemsPanelTemplate>
      </StatusBar.ItemsPanel>
      <StatusBarItem>Ready</StatusBarItem>
      <StatusBarItem Grid.Column="1" Content="StatusBarItem" />
    </StatusBar>
  </DockPanel>
</Window>

while the second one was:

<Window
 xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
 xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
 x:Class="StatusBarInWpf.Window1"
 x:Name="Window"
 Title="Window1"
 Width="640" Height="480">

 <Window.Resources>
  <ItemsPanelTemplate x:Key="StatusBarItemTemplate">
   <Grid>
    <Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
     <ColumnDefinition Width="4*"/>
     <ColumnDefinition Width="Auto"/>
     <ColumnDefinition/>
    </Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
    <Grid.RowDefinitions>
     <RowDefinition/>
    </Grid.RowDefinitions>
   </Grid>
  </ItemsPanelTemplate>
 </Window.Resources>

 <DockPanel>
  <StatusBar Height="20" DockPanel.Dock="Bottom" ItemsPanel="{DynamicResource StatusBarItemTemplate}">
   <StatusBarItem Content="Ready" Grid.Column="0"/>
   <StatusBarItem Content="StatusBarItem" Grid.Column="1"/>
  </StatusBar>
 </DockPanel>
</Window>

The thing I love about the second version is the way that the StatusBar template is removed from the actual implementation of the StatusBar, so you can move them into one place (currently in the Window.Resources but this could be put into a named template or the Application.Resources) and manage them really easily.

3 Comments »

  1. [...] Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: WPF — peteohanlon @ 8:12 pm In a previous  post I looked at why WPF was something to really take a look at. I posted a bare bones WPF page [...]

    Pingback by Still lovin’ WPF « Musings and frustrations — April 22, 2008 @ 8:12 pm

  2. Are there any specific advantages that you found when using WPF? I am starting a new application, and would love to hear about your experience. Does it work well on Windows XP, Windows 2003?

    Comment by Thomas George — May 18, 2008 @ 4:13 pm

  3. Thomas - We’ve found some real advantages in using WPF. Possibly the biggest advantage for us is the binding support - by using a trigger on an element for instance, we can change the colour of another item to indicate that it is outside a particular threshold (all done in the XAML).

    Comment by peteohanlon — May 19, 2008 @ 12:04 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com.