Comments on: Lovin’ WPF http://peteohanlon.wordpress.com/2008/04/20/lovin-wpf/ Confessions of a WPF lover Sat, 14 Nov 2009 07:45:20 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: peteohanlon http://peteohanlon.wordpress.com/2008/04/20/lovin-wpf/#comment-63 peteohanlon Fri, 05 Sep 2008 08:27:15 +0000 http://peteohanlon.wordpress.com/?p=21#comment-63 Evan - I know what you mean. The more you do with WPF, the more you find you can do. It's the flexibility and the power that is so appealing. Evan – I know what you mean. The more you do with WPF, the more you find you can do. It’s the flexibility and the power that is so appealing.

]]> By: evankstone http://peteohanlon.wordpress.com/2008/04/20/lovin-wpf/#comment-62 evankstone Thu, 04 Sep 2008 22:26:58 +0000 http://peteohanlon.wordpress.com/?p=21#comment-62 ...the more I use WPF the more I really like it, and it's usually because of stuff just like you demonstrated here. Thanks! …the more I use WPF the more I really like it, and it’s usually because of stuff just like you demonstrated here.

Thanks!

]]> By: peteohanlon http://peteohanlon.wordpress.com/2008/04/20/lovin-wpf/#comment-50 peteohanlon Mon, 19 May 2008 12:04:31 +0000 http://peteohanlon.wordpress.com/?p=21#comment-50 Thomas - We've found some real advantages in using WPF. Possibly the biggest advantage for us is the binding support - by using a trigger on an element for instance, we can change the colour of another item to indicate that it is outside a particular threshold (all done in the XAML). Thomas – We’ve found some real advantages in using WPF. Possibly the biggest advantage for us is the binding support – by using a trigger on an element for instance, we can change the colour of another item to indicate that it is outside a particular threshold (all done in the XAML).

]]> By: Thomas George http://peteohanlon.wordpress.com/2008/04/20/lovin-wpf/#comment-49 Thomas George Sun, 18 May 2008 16:13:25 +0000 http://peteohanlon.wordpress.com/?p=21#comment-49 Are there any specific advantages that you found when using WPF? I am starting a new application, and would love to hear about your experience. Does it work well on Windows XP, Windows 2003? Are there any specific advantages that you found when using WPF? I am starting a new application, and would love to hear about your experience. Does it work well on Windows XP, Windows 2003?

]]> By: WPF/Silverlight/XAML Web News - 2008/04/25 - Rob Relyea - Xamlified http://peteohanlon.wordpress.com/2008/04/20/lovin-wpf/#comment-47 WPF/Silverlight/XAML Web News - 2008/04/25 - Rob Relyea - Xamlified Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:44:49 +0000 http://peteohanlon.wordpress.com/?p=21#comment-47 [...] Lovin' WPF, Pete won the rest of his dev team over by showing them a StatusBar [...] [...] Lovin' WPF, Pete won the rest of his dev team over by showing them a StatusBar [...]

]]> By: Still lovin’ WPF « Musings and frustrations http://peteohanlon.wordpress.com/2008/04/20/lovin-wpf/#comment-44 Still lovin’ WPF « Musings and frustrations Tue, 22 Apr 2008 20:12:40 +0000 http://peteohanlon.wordpress.com/?p=21#comment-44 [...] Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: WPF — peteohanlon @ 8:12 pm In a previous  post I looked at why WPF was something to really take a look at. I posted a bare bones WPF page [...] [...] Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: WPF — peteohanlon @ 8:12 pm In a previous  post I looked at why WPF was something to really take a look at. I posted a bare bones WPF page [...]

]]>